Dowling, J. P. & Milburn, G. J. Quantum technology: the second quantum revolution. Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 361, 1655–1674 (2003).
Google Scholar
O’Brien, J. L., Furusawa, A. & Vučković, J. Photonic quantum technologies. Nat. Photon. 3, 687–695 (2009).
Gisin, N. & Thew, R. Quantum communication. Nat. Photon. 1, 165–171 (2007).
Google Scholar
Sangouard, N., Simon, C., de Riedmatten, H. & Gisin, N. Quantum repeaters based on atomic ensembles and linear optics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 33–80 (2011).
Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000)
Ralph, T. C. & Pryde, G. J. Optical quantum computation. Prog. Opt. 54, 209–269 (2010).
Kimble, H. J. The quantum internet. Nature 453, 1023–1030 (2008).
Google Scholar
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S. & Maccone, L. Quantum-enhanced measurements: beating the standard quantum limit. Science 306, 1330–1336 (2004).
Google Scholar
Aspect, A., Grangier, P. & Roger, G. Experimental tests of realistic local theories via Bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460–463 (1981).
Google Scholar
Bennett, C. H., Bessette, F., Brassard, G., Salvail, L. & Smolin, J. Experimental quantum cryptography. J. Cryptol. 5, 3–28 (1992).
Xiao, M., Wu, L.-A. & Kimble, H. J. Precision measurement beyond the shot-noise limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 278–281 (1987).
Google Scholar
Bouwmeester, D. et al. Experimental quantum teleportation. Nature 390, 575–579 (1997).
Google Scholar
Furusawa, A. et al. Unconditional quantum teleportation. Science 282, 706–709 (1998).
Google Scholar
O’Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., White, A. G., Ralph, T. C. & Branning, D. Demonstration of an all-optical quantum controlled-not gate. Nature 426, 264–267 (2003).
Google Scholar
Walther, P. et al. Experimental one-way quantum computing. Nature 434, 169–176 (2005).
Google Scholar
Knill, E., Laflamme, R. & Milburn, G. J. A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. Nature 409, 46–52 (2001).
Google Scholar
Pan, J.-W., Gasparoni, S., Ursin, R., Weihs, G. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental entanglement purification of arbitrary unknown states. Nature 423, 417–422 (2003).
Google Scholar
Kok, P. et al. Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits. Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 135–174 (2007).
Google Scholar
Pan, J.-W. et al. Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 777–838 (2012).
Weedbrook, C. et al. Gaussian quantum information. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 621–669 (2012).
Kwiat, P. G. et al. New high-intensity source of polarization-entangled photon pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4337–4341 (1995).
Google Scholar
Kimble, H. J., Dagenais, M. & Mandel, L. Photon antibunching in resonance fluorescence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 691–695 (1977).
Google Scholar
Senellart, P., Solomon, G. & White, A. High-performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 1026–1039 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wang, X.-L. et al. Experimental ten-photon entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 210502 (2016).
Google Scholar
Mosley, P. J. et al. Heralded generation of ultrafast single photons in pure quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 133601 (2008).
Google Scholar
Takeuchi, S. Beamlike twin-photon generation by use of type II parametric downconversion. Opt. Lett. 26, 843–845 (2001).
Google Scholar
Zhong, H.-S. et al. 12-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 250505 (2018).
Google Scholar
Silverstone, J. W. et al. On-chip quantum interference between silicon photon-pair sources. Nat. Photon. 8, 104–108 (2014).
Google Scholar
Paesani, S. et al. Near-ideal spontaneous photon sources in silicon quantum photonics. Nat. Commun. 11, 2505 (2020).
Google Scholar
Pittman, T., Jacobs, B. & Franson, J. Single photons on pseudodemand from stored parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. A 66, 042303 (2002).
Migdall, A. L., Branning, D. & Castelletto, S. Tailoring single-photon and multiphoton probabilities of a single-photon on-demand source. Phys. Rev. A 66, 053805 (2002).
Kaneda, F. & Kwiat, P. G. High-efficiency single-photon generation via large-scale active time multiplexing. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw8586 (2019).
Google Scholar
Najer, D. et al. A gated quantum dot strongly coupled to an optical microcavity. Nature 575, 622–627 (2019).
Google Scholar
He, Y.-M. et al. On-demand semiconductor single-photon source with near-unity indistinguishability. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 213–217 (2013).
Google Scholar
Wang, H. et al. Towards optimal single-photon sources from polarized microcavities. Nat. Photon. 13, 770–775 (2019).
Google Scholar
Tomm, N. et al. A bright and fast source of coherent single photons. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 399–403 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ding, X. et al. High-efficiency single-photon source above the loss-tolerant threshold for efficient linear optical quantum computing. Nat. Photon. 19, 387–391 (2025).
Google Scholar
Lodahl, P., Mahmoodian, S. & Stobbe, S. Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 347–400 (2015).
Google Scholar
Zhai, L. et al. Quantum interference of identical photons from remote GaAs quantum dots. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 829–833 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lindner, N. H. & Rudolph, T. A photonic cluster state machine gun. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 113602 (2009).
Google Scholar
Vahlbruch, H., Mehmet, M., Danzmann, K. & Schnabel, R. Detection of 15 dB squeezed states of light and their application for the absolute calibration of photoelectric quantum efficiency. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 110801 (2016).
Google Scholar
Dodd, J. L., Ralph, T. C. & Milburn, G. J. Experimental requirements for Grover’s algorithm in optical quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 68, 042328 (2003).
Procopio, L. M. et al. Experimental superposition of orders of quantum gates. Nat. Commun. 6, 7913 (2015).
Google Scholar
Weston, M. M. et al. Quantum channel correction outperforming direct transmission. Nat. Commun. 13, 1832 (2022).
Google Scholar
Raussendorf, R. & Briegel, H. J. A one-way quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188–5191 (2001).
Google Scholar
Jin, R.-B. et al. Pulsed Sagnac polarization-entangled photon source with a PPKTP crystal at telecom wavelength. Opt. Express 22, 11498–11507 (2014).
Google Scholar
Marcikic, I. et al. Time-bin entangled qubits for quantum communication created by femtosecond pulses. Phys. Rev. A 66, 062308 (2002).
Jouguet, P., Kunz-Jacques, S., Leverrier, A., Grangier, P. & Diamanti, E. Experimental demonstration of long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution. Nat. Photon. 7, 378–381 (2013).
Google Scholar
Xiong, C. et al. Active temporal multiplexing of indistinguishable heralded single photons. Nat. Commun. 7, 10853 (2016).
Google Scholar
Wang, H. et al. Boson sampling with 20 input photons in 60-mode interferometers at 1014 state spaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 250503 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wang, J., Sciarrino, F., Laing, A. & Thompson, M. G. Integrated photonic quantum technologies. Nat. Photon. 14, 273–284 (2020).
Google Scholar
Pelucchi, E. et al. The potential and global outlook of integrated photonics for quantum technologies. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 194–208 (2022).
Jeffrey, T. & Hull, D. Integrated Photonics (OP-TEC, Univ. Central Florida, 2016)
Silverstone, J. W., Bonneau, D., O’Brien, J. L. & Thompson, M. G. Silicon quantum photonics. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 22, 390–402 (2016).
Roeloffzen, C. G. H. et al. Low-loss Si3N4 TriPleX optical waveguides: technology and applications overview. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 24, 4400321 (2018).
Dietrich, C. P., Fiore, A., Thompson, M. G., Kamp, M. & Höfling, S. GaAs integrated quantum photonics: towards compact and multi-functional quantum photonic integrated circuits. Laser Photonics Rev. 10, 870–894 (2016).
Google Scholar
Lukin, D. M., Guidry, M. A. & Vuckovic, J. Integrated quantum photonics with silicon carbide: challenges and prospects. PRX Quantum 1, 020102 (2020).
Meany, T. et al. Laser written circuits for quantum photonics. Laser Photonics Rev. 9, 363–384 (2015).
Google Scholar
Zhu, D. et al. Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate. Adv. Opt. Photonics 13, 242–352 (2021).
Gol’tsman, G. N. et al. Picosecond superconducting single-photon optical detector. Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 705–707 (2001).
Rosfjord, K. M. et al. Nanowire single-photon detector with an integrated optical cavity and anti-reflection coating. Opt. Express 14, 527–534 (2001).
Reddy, D. V., Nerem, R. R., Nam, S. W., Mirin, R. P. & Verma, V. B. Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors with 98% system detection efficiency at 1550 nm. Optica 7, 1649–1653 (2020).
Korzh, B. et al. Demonstration of sub-3 ps temporal resolution with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector. Nat. Photon. 14, 250–255 (2020).
Google Scholar
Andrews, D. H., Brucksch, W. F. Jr., Ziegler, W. T. & Blanchard, E. R. Attenuated superconductors I. For measuring infra-red radiation. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 13, 281–292 (1942).
Lita, A. E., Miller, A. J. & Nam, S. W. Counting near-infrared single-photons with 95% efficiency. Opt. Express 16, 3032–3040 (2008).
Google Scholar
Schuck, C., Pernice, W. H. P. & Tang, H. X. Waveguide integrated low noise NbTiN nanowire single-photon detectors with milli-Hz dark count rate. Sci. Rep. 3, 1893 (2013).
Google Scholar
Sahin, D. et al. Waveguide photon-number-resolving detectors for quantum photonic integrated circuits. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 111116 (2013).
Höpker, J. P. et al. Integrated transition edge sensors on titanium in-diffused lithium niobate waveguides. APL Photonics 4, 056103 (2019).
Pernice, W. H. P. et al. High-speed and high-efficiency travelling wave single-photon detectors embedded in nanophotonic circuits. Nat. Commun. 3, 1325 (2012).
Google Scholar
Cheng, R. et al. A 100-pixel photon-number-resolving detector unveiling photon statistics. Nat. Photon. 17, 112–119 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bennett, C. H. & Brassard, G. Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing. In International Conference on Computers, Systems & Signal Processing 175–179 (Theoretical Computer Science, 1984).
Ekert, A. K. Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661–663 (1991).
Google Scholar
Bennett, C. H. et al. Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895–1899 (1993).
Google Scholar
Bennett, C. H. & Brassard, G. Experimental quantum cryptography: the dawn of a new era for quantum cryptography: the experimental prototype is working. ACM SIGACT News 20, 78–80 (1989).
Wang, X.-B. Beating the photon-number-splitting attack in practical quantum cryptography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 230503 (2005).
Google Scholar
Lo, H.-K., Ma, X. & Chen, K. Decoy state quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 230504 (2005).
Google Scholar
Boaron, A. et al. Secure quantum key distribution over 421 km of optical fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 190502 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y.-A. et al. An integrated space-to-ground quantum communication network over 4,600 kilometres. Nature 589, 214–219 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lo, H.-K., Curty, M. & Qi, B. Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 130503 (2012).
Google Scholar
Yin, H.-L. et al. Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution over a 404 km optical fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 190501 (2016).
Google Scholar
Lucamarini, M., Yuan, Z. L., Dynes, J. F. & Shields, A. J. Overcoming the rate–distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters. Nature 557, 400–403 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wang, S. et al. Twin-field quantum key distribution over 830-km fibre. Nat. Photon. 16, 154–161 (2022).
Chen, J.-P. et al. Twin-field quantum key distribution over a 511 km optical fibre linking two distant metropolitan areas. Nat. Photon. 15, 570–575 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pittaluga, M. et al. Long-distance coherent quantum communications in deployed telecom networks. Nature 640, 911–917 (2025).
Google Scholar
Grosshans, F. & Grangier, P. Continuous variable quantum cryptography using coherent states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 057902 (2002).
Google Scholar
Weedbrook, C. et al. Quantum cryptography without switching. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 170504 (2004).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. Long-distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution over 202.81 km of fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 010502 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wootters, W. K. & Zurek, W. H. A single quantum cannot be cloned. Nature 299, 802–803 (1982).
Google Scholar
Briegel, H.-J., Dür, W., Cirac, J. I. & Zoller, P. Quantum repeaters: the role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5932–5935 (1998).
Google Scholar
Duan, L.-M., Lukin, M. D., Cirac, J. I. & Zoller, P. Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics. Nature 414, 413–418 (2001).
Google Scholar
Pan, J.-W., Bouwmeester, D., Weinfurter, H. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental entanglement swapping: entangling photons that never interacted. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3891–3894 (1998).
Google Scholar
Hensen, B. et al. Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres. Nature 526, 682–686 (2015).
Google Scholar
Yu, Y. et al. Entanglement of two quantum memories via fibres over dozens of kilometres. Nature 578, 240–245 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bhaskar, M. K. et al. Experimental demonstration of memory-enhanced quantum communication. Nature 580, 60–64 (2020).
Google Scholar
Liu, J.-L. et al. Creation of memory–memory entanglement in a metropolitan quantum network. Nature 629, 579–585 (2024).
Google Scholar
Knaut, C. M. et al. Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom network. Nature 629, 573–578 (2024).
Google Scholar
Stolk, A. J. et al. Metropolitan-scale heralded entanglement of solid-state qubits. Sci. Adv. 10, eadp6442 (2024).
Google Scholar
Liao, S.-K. et al. Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution. Nature 549, 43–47 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yin, J. et al. Satellite-based entanglement distribution over 1200 kilometers. Science 356, 1140–1144 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yin, J. et al. Entanglement-based secure quantum cryptography over 1,120 kilometres. Nature 582, 501–505 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ren, J.-G. et al. Ground-to-satellite quantum teleportation. Nature 549, 70–73 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lu, C.-Y., Browne, D. E., Yang, T. & Pan, J.-W. Demonstration of a compiled version of Shor’s quantum factoring algorithm using photonic qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 250504 (2007).
Google Scholar
Lanyon, B. P. et al. Experimental demonstration of a compiled version of Shor’s algorithm with quantum entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 250505 (2007).
Google Scholar
Peruzzo, A. et al. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor. Nat. Commun. 5, 4213 (2014).
Google Scholar
Milburn, G. J. A quantum Fredkin gate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2124–2127 (1989).
Google Scholar
Nielsen, M. A. Optical quantum computation using cluster states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 040503 (2004).
Google Scholar
Dawson, C. M., Haselgrove, H. L. & Nielsen, M. A. Noise thresholds for optical quantum computers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 020501 (2006).
Google Scholar
Rudolph, T. Why I am optimistic about the silicon-photonic route to quantum computing. APL Photonics 2, 030901 (2017).
Carolan, J. et al. Universal linear optics. Science 349, 711–716 (2015).
Google Scholar
Qiang, X. et al. Large-scale silicon quantum photonics implementing arbitrary two-qubit processing. Nat. Photon. 12, 534–539 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mennea, P. et al. Modular linear optical circuits. Optica 5, 1087–1094 (2018).
Google Scholar
Meyer-Scott, E. et al. Scalable generation of multiphoton entangled states by active feed-forward and multiplexing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 150501 (2022).
Google Scholar
Schön, C., Solano, E., Verstraete, F., Cirac, J. I. & Wolf, M. M. Sequential generation of entangled multiqubit states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 110503 (2005).
Google Scholar
Economou, S. E., Lindner, N. H. & Rudolph, T. Optically generated 2-dimensional photonic cluster state from coupled quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 093601 (2010).
Google Scholar
Gimeno-Segovia, M., Rudolph, T. & Economou, S. E. Deterministic generation of large-scale entangled photonic cluster state from interacting solid state emitters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 070501 (2019).
Google Scholar
Schwartz, I. et al. Deterministic generation of a cluster state of entangled photons. Science 354, 434–437 (2016).
Google Scholar
Cogan, D., Su, Z.-E., Kenneth, O. & Gershoni, D. Deterministic generation of indistinguishable photons in a cluster state. Nat. Photon. 17, 324–329 (2023).
Google Scholar
Coste, N. et al. High-rate entanglement between a semiconductor spin and indistinguishable photons. Nat. Photon. 17, 582–587 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yang, C.-W. et al. Highly efficient multiphoton generation with photon-number-resolving detectors. Nat. Photon. 16, 658–661 (2022).
Google Scholar
Thomas, P., Ruscio, L., Morin, O. & Rempe, G. Efficient generation of entangled multiphoton graph states from a single atom. Nature 608, 677–681 (2022).
Google Scholar
Thomas, P., Ruscio, L., Morin, O. & Rempe, G. Fusion of deterministically generated photonic graph states. Nature 629, 567–572 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hacker, B., Welte, S., Rempe, G. & Ritter, S. A photon–photon quantum gate based on a single atom in an optical resonator. Nature 536, 193–196 (2016).
Google Scholar
Hastrup, J. & Andersen, U. L. Protocol for generating optical Gottesman–Kitaev–Preskill states with cavity QED. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 170503 (2022).
Google Scholar
Menicucci, N. C. et al. Universal quantum computation with continuous-variable cluster states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 110501 (2006).
Google Scholar
Menicucci, N. C. Fault-tolerant measurement-based quantum computing with continuous-variable cluster states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 120504 (2014).
Google Scholar
Menicucci, N. C., Ma, X. & Ralph, T. C. Arbitrarily large continuous-variable cluster states from a single quantum nondemolition gate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 250503 (2010).
Google Scholar
Yokoyama, S. et al. Ultra-large-scale continuous-variable cluster states multiplexed in the time domain. Nat. Photon. 7, 982–986 (2013).
Google Scholar
Asavanant, W. et al. Generation of time-domain-multiplexed two-dimensional cluster state. Science 366, 373–376 (2019).
Google Scholar
Larsen, M. V., Guo, X., Breum, C. R., Neergaard-Nielsen, J. S. & Andersen, U. L. Deterministic generation of a two-dimensional cluster state. Science 366, 369–372 (2019).
Google Scholar
Larsen, M. V., Guo, X., Breum, C. R., Neergaard-Nielsen, J. S. & Andersen, U. L. Deterministic multi-mode gates on a scalable photonic quantum computing platform. Nat. Phys. 17, 1018–1023 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gottesman, D., Kitaev, A. & Preskill, J. Encoding a qubit in an oscillator. Phys. Rev. A 64, 012310 (2001).
Konno, S. et al. Logical states for fault-tolerant quantum computation with propagating light. Science 383, 289–293 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ourjoumtsev, A., Jeong, H., Tualle-Brouri, R. & Grangier, P. Generation of optical ‘Schrödinger’ cats from photon number states. Nature 448, 784–786 (2007).
Google Scholar
Aaronson, S. & Arkhipov, A. The computational complexity of linear optics. Theory Comput. 9, 143–252 (2013).
Lund, A. et al. Boson sampling from a Gaussian state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 100502 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hamilton, C. S. et al. Gaussian boson sampling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 170501 (2017).
Google Scholar
Broome, M. A. et al. Photonic boson sampling in a tunable circuit. Science 339, 794–798 (2013).
Google Scholar
Spring, J. B. et al. Boson sampling on a photonic chip. Science 339, 798–801 (2013).
Google Scholar
Crespi, A. et al. Integrated multimode interferometers with arbitrary designs for photonic boson sampling. Nat. Photon. 7, 545–549 (2013).
Google Scholar
Tillmann, M. et al. Experimental boson sampling. Nat. Photon. 7, 540–544 (2013).
Google Scholar
Wang, H. et al. High-efficiency multiphoton boson sampling. Nat. Photon. 11, 361–365 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhong, H.-S. et al. Quantum computational advantage using photons. Science 370, 1460–1463 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhong, H.-S. et al. Phase-programmable gaussian boson sampling using stimulated squeezed light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 180502 (2021).
Google Scholar
Deng, Y.-H. et al. Gaussian boson sampling with pseudo-photon-number resolving detectors and quantum computational advantage. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 150601 (2023).
Google Scholar
Madsen, L. S. et al. Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor. Nature 606, 75–81 (2022).
Google Scholar
Caves, C. M. Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer. Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693–1708 (1981).
Abbott, R. et al. GWTC-2: compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run. Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021).
Google Scholar
Abbott, R. et al. GWTC-3: compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the second part of the third observing run. Phys. Rev. X 13, 041039 (2021).
Lough, J. et al. First demonstration of 6 dB quantum noise reduction in a kilometer scale gravitational wave observatory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 041102 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cheng, J.-X. & Xie, X. S. Vibrational spectroscopic imaging of living systems: an emerging platform for biology and medicine. Science 350, aaa8870 (2015).
Google Scholar
Wei, L. et al. Super-multiplex vibrational imaging. Nature 544, 465–470 (2017).
Google Scholar
Casacio, C. A. et al. Quantum-enhanced nonlinear microscopy. Nature 594, 201–206 (2021).
Google Scholar
Weston, M. M. et al. Efficient and pure femtosecond-pulse-length source of polarization-entangled photons. Opt. Express 24, 10869–10879 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kaneda, F., Garay-Palmett, K., U’Ren, A. B. & Kwiat, P. G. Heralded single-photon source utilizing highly nondegenerate, spectrally factorable spontaneous parametric down conversion. Opt. Express 24, 10733–10747 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ma, X.-s., Zotter, S., Kofler, J., Jennewein, T. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental generation of single photons via active multiplexing. Phys. Rev. A 83, 043814 (2011).
Kaneda, F. et al. Time-multiplexed heralded single-photon source. Optica 2, 1010–1013 (2015).
Google Scholar
Joshi, C., Farsi, A., Clemmen, S., Ramelow, S. & Gaeta, A. L. Frequency multiplexing for quasi-deterministic heralded single-photon sources. Nat. Commun. 9, 847 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ralph, T. C., Hayes, A. J. F. & Gilchrist, A. Loss-tolerant optical qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 100501 (2005).
Google Scholar
Ralph, T. C., Gilchrist, A., Milburn, G. J., Munro, W. J. & Glancy, S. Quantum computation with coherent optical states. Phys. Rev. A 68, 042319 (2003).
Zurek, W. H. Sub-Planck structure in phase space and its relevance for quantum decoherence. Nature 412, 712–717 (2001).
Google Scholar
