• May 21, 2025
  • Live Match Score
  • 0


The NFL got this one right.

The Tush Push isn’t going anywhere, according to multiple reports on Wednesday, and that’s a huge win for football fans across the globe.

Jalen Hurts won the Super Bowl by running over opponents

4

Jalen Hurts won the Super Bowl by running over opponentsCredit: Getty

Jalen Hurts, Saquon Barkley and the Philadelphia Eagles won the latest Super Bowl with old-school football domination.

Three months later, the Green Bay Packers tried to get the famous but controversial push banned.

But that vote reportedly failed, and ESPN reported that a required 75 percent vote against the push was not met.

“Push on,” the Eagles tweeted minutes after the news broke.

“Final vote on the proposed ban of the Tush Push, per sources: 22-10,” Adam Schefter tweeted.

“At least 24 votes were needed to ban The Tush Push.”

The Packers and several other teams were obviously afraid of the unstoppable monster that has become the Eagles’ rugby-style Tush Push.

“The Packers have submitted updated language for their Tush Push proposal, one that will be voted on at the league meeting on Wednesday,” NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport tweeted.

Listed in that ‘language’ was unintentional football comedy.

“Penalty: For assisting the runner, interlocking interference, or illegal use of hands, arms, or body by the offense – loss of 10 yards.

“Effect: Prohibits an offensive player from pushing, pulling, lifting, or assisting the runner except by individually blocking opponents for him.

Hurts blew by the Packers on the field

4

Hurts blew by the Packers on the fieldCredit: Getty
The Tush Push has become the Eagles' patented move

4

The Tush Push has become the Eagles’ patented moveCredit: Getty

“Reason: Player safety. Pace of play.”

Of course, the real reason was left out of all the legalese.

The Packers — and about half of the league’s 32 teams — just watched the Eagles thrash Patrick Mahomes, Travis Kelce, Andy Reid and the once-unstoppable Kansas City Chiefs in Super Bowl LIX.

The Tush Push symbolized the Eagles’ 18-3 overall record last season.

And the Tush Push — which isn’t even the play’s real name — has become synonymous with the best team in the league in 2025.

“The fact that it’s a successful play for the Eagles and people want to take that away, I think is a little unfair,” Philadelphia head coach Nick Sirianni said.

NFL’s Greatest……

Ranking the top 10……

Nakobe Dean & Shannon Sharpe react to the NFL wanting to ban the ‘Tush push’

The best way to get rid of a play that can’t be stopped 99 percent of the time?

Change the rules — and try to ban it.

“It’s tough to punish a team for being really good at something,” Houston Texans coach DeMeco Ryans said.

There’s no hard evidence that shows the Tush Push is inherently dangerous.

There’s less evidence to show that banning the Tush Push will improve ‘pace of play.’

Normally, that’s a problem reserved for commissioner Rob Manfred and Major League Baseball.

The Packers looked desperate, frightened and out of touch.

They were also taking one for the team by coming up with a bunch of silly reasons that might have convinced 24 of the NFL’s 32 franchises to ban what’s basically become a guaranteed first down/touchdown for the reigning Super Bowl champs.

The Washington Commanders turned themselves into a clown show in the 2024 NFC Championship, jumping offsides over and over in a desperate attempt to stop the push before it started.

Hurts had a lot of help on the way to the end zone

4

Hurts had a lot of help on the way to the end zone

Sirianni’s crew racked up 55 points and 459 total yards in that blowout, including 229 on the ground.

“Credit to the Eagles, man, they played better than us from start to finish,” said Mahomes in the Super Bowl, on a night when Philly led 34-0 and 40-6 in a lopsided Superdome.

During an era of dual-threat quarterbacks and wide-open spread offenses, the Eagles have ‘invented’ an old-school play that has more in common with 1921 than 2025.

After a failed ban attempt, the tush push lives on … for at least one more year.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *